前段時間為gre考生匯總了gre issue寫作提綱思路和分析，希望對考生在攻破gre issue寫作上有所幫助。接下來的幾天我們將為gre考生整理gre argument部分的提綱內容。希望通過我們的整理和匯總，讓gre考生真正能掌握gre寫作的精髓。

　　題目題材：社會

　　gre argument 161題目：

　　In a study of reading habits of Leeville citizens conducted by the University of Leeville, most respondents said they preferred literary classics as reading material. However, a follow-up study conducted by the same researchers found that the type of book most frequently checked out of each of the public libraries in Leeville was the mystery novel. Therefore, it can be concluded that the respondents in the first study had misrepresented their reading habits.

　　提綱：

　　We do not know how many, and what kind of citizens responded to the survey, thus the representativeness of the result is open to doubt.

　　The frequency of certain type of book being checked out from the public libraries is not a good indication of what kind of reading material do citizens prefer.

　　The author does not analyze to what extent the literary classics and mystery novels mentioned in the argument overlap.

　　The author fails to provide evidence to show that the result of the follow-up study is representative of all-time reading habits of Leeville citizens.

　　We do not know how long is the interim period between the two studies, many conditions may change after sufficient long time.

　　The author unfairly assumes that the respondents in the first study borrow most of their reading materials from public libraries.

　　The author fails to consider other explanation that could explain the discrepancy between the respondents answer and the result of the follow-up study, e.g. if the respondents were forthright, if they correctly understood the surveys question, etc.

　　無論是gre issue還是gre argument，考生都應該養成寫提綱的習慣。這種提綱式的gre寫作練習可以幫助考生鍛煉寫作的邏輯性，而gre寫作高分最重要的得分依據就是作文的邏輯性要強。

　　前段時間為gre考生匯總了gre issue寫作提綱思路和分析，希望對考生在攻破gre issue寫作上有所幫助。接下來的幾天我們將為gre考生整理gre argument部分的提綱內容。希望通過我們的整理和匯總，讓gre考生真正能掌握gre寫作的精髓。

　　題目題材：社會

　　gre argument 161題目：

　　In a study of reading habits of Leeville citizens conducted by the University of Leeville, most respondents said they preferred literary classics as reading material. However, a follow-up study conducted by the same researchers found that the type of book most frequently checked out of each of the public libraries in Leeville was the mystery novel. Therefore, it can be concluded that the respondents in the first study had misrepresented their reading habits.

　　提綱：

　　We do not know how many, and what kind of citizens responded to the survey, thus the representativeness of the result is open to doubt.

　　The frequency of certain type of book being checked out from the public libraries is not a good indication of what kind of reading material do citizens prefer.

　　The author does not analyze to what extent the literary classics and mystery novels mentioned in the argument overlap.

　　The author fails to provide evidence to show that the result of the follow-up study is representative of all-time reading habits of Leeville citizens.

　　We do not know how long is the interim period between the two studies, many conditions may change after sufficient long time.

　　The author unfairly assumes that the respondents in the first study borrow most of their reading materials from public libraries.

　　The author fails to consider other explanation that could explain the discrepancy between the respondents answer and the result of the follow-up study, e.g. if the respondents were forthright, if they correctly understood the surveys question, etc.

　　無論是gre issue還是gre argument，考生都應該養成寫提綱的習慣。這種提綱式的gre寫作練習可以幫助考生鍛煉寫作的邏輯性，而gre寫作高分最重要的得分依據就是作文的邏輯性要強。