精品一区二区三区在线播放_羞羞答答视频_国产成人网_久久综合给合久久狠狠狠97色69_亚洲啪啪_国产成人网

2023年職稱英語考試綜合類完型填空訓練題

雕龍文庫 分享 時間: 收藏本文

2023年職稱英語考試綜合類完型填空訓練題

  Will the reform on the use of government cars really reduce office expenditure 1 this count? There are no reports 2 such an outcome although some local governments have moved in that direction.

  Hangzhou government 3 its reform last month. Officials below the level of deputy bureau chief cannot use official cars for business trips. Instead they get subsidies between 300 and 2,600 yuan a month according to their administrative rank. This reform is supposed to save the government the money involving in __4__ a large number of cars.

  Hangzhou in east China Zhejiang province is not the first to attempt __5.__ reform. Nanjing, capital of the neighboring Jiangsu province, did so five years ago. Yet there is no report available of how much money the Nanjing government has saved 6 these measures. All that we know about is. the fact 7 government officials get monthly subsidies for business trips.

  The public have a right to 8 for transparency on the results of such reform 9 it is taxpayers money that is being spent. Transparency is needed because people are 10 about policy, makers making policy against their own interests.

  Obviously, the subsidies are not based on work needs. Lower level officials usually travel 11 than high-ranking officials. Therefore, the impact of reform appears to be diluted.

  Transparency alone can tell us 12 the reform measures have indeed reduced government transport expenditure. If there is no disclosure of amounts saved by the reform, the public may have reason to suspect that the reform is actually a ploy 13 the income of officials in the form of a transport subsidy.

  The way government cars are used needs to be reformed, The government spending on purchase of cars was 80 billion yuan in 2008, and use and maintenance amounts to around 300 billion yuan a year.

  A study of ancient Chinese dynasties shows that the more reforms of the tax system, the heavier the taxes eventually 14 on subjects.

  The only way to prevent this vicious cycles from happening with government car reform today is for the higher authorities to have a strict and 15 audit of local finance.

  練習:

  1. A) on B) in C) about D) to

  2. A) indicates B) indicating C) indicated D) indicate

  3. A) completed B) terminated C) launched D) finished

  4. A) maintaining B) maintained C) maintenance D) maintain

  5. A) such a B) as such C) such that D) such

  6. A) by B) on C) through D) in

  7. A) which B) whether C) in which D) that

  8. A) providing B) offering C) supplying D) asking

  9. A) because B) therefore C) because of D) thus

  10. A) satisfied B) pleased C) skeptical D) confused

  11. A) less B) more C) faster D) farther

  12. A) how B) which C) that D) whether

  13. A) increased B) to be increased C) to increase D) increase

  14. A) levied B) taken C) consumed D) removed

  15. A) opaque B) transparent C) obscure D) ambiguous

  答案:A B C A A  A D D A C  B D C A B

  進行中的改革

  政府車輛使用的改革能夠真正減少辦公費用支出嗎?雖然部分地區政府已經朝著改革的方向有所行動,但是,并沒有報告顯示支出減少這樣的結果。

  杭州政府上個月實施了改革。副局級以下官員不能將公務出差作為商業旅行。相反,他們每個月可以根據自己的行政級別取得300元到2,600元不等的補貼。這項改革的目的是讓政府節省大量維護車輛的費用。

  位于中國浙江省東部的杭州并不是第一個實施這類改革的地區。鄰省江蘇省的省會南京市在五年前就已經實施了。然而,卻沒有任何報告表明南京市政府通過這些措施節省了費用。政府官員每月可能有出差補助。

  公眾有權利要求此類改革有透明度,因為這些費用花的正是納稅人的錢。納稅入要求政策制定有透明度是因為擔心決策者做出有悖于他們利益的事。

  很明顯,這些補助不是基于工作的需要。低級的公務員比高級公務員出差更多。因此,這項改革的作用似乎很小。

  只有透明度能告訴我們這些改革措施是否的確降低了政府的交通費用。如果沒有公開改革所節省的費用數目,那么,公眾有理由懷疑這項改革只是官員用車補的形式提高自己收入的一種手段。政府車輛的使用需要改革。2008年,政府花費了些購車費用,并且一年的使用和維護費用也是較大的。

  一項研究表明,稅收政策的改革越多,稅率也會發生相應的調整。現在,唯一能夠防些政府車輛改革發生惡性循環的方法就是更高級別政府機關能夠對地方財政進行嚴格而透明的監管。

  

  Will the reform on the use of government cars really reduce office expenditure 1 this count? There are no reports 2 such an outcome although some local governments have moved in that direction.

  Hangzhou government 3 its reform last month. Officials below the level of deputy bureau chief cannot use official cars for business trips. Instead they get subsidies between 300 and 2,600 yuan a month according to their administrative rank. This reform is supposed to save the government the money involving in __4__ a large number of cars.

  Hangzhou in east China Zhejiang province is not the first to attempt __5.__ reform. Nanjing, capital of the neighboring Jiangsu province, did so five years ago. Yet there is no report available of how much money the Nanjing government has saved 6 these measures. All that we know about is. the fact 7 government officials get monthly subsidies for business trips.

  The public have a right to 8 for transparency on the results of such reform 9 it is taxpayers money that is being spent. Transparency is needed because people are 10 about policy, makers making policy against their own interests.

  Obviously, the subsidies are not based on work needs. Lower level officials usually travel 11 than high-ranking officials. Therefore, the impact of reform appears to be diluted.

  Transparency alone can tell us 12 the reform measures have indeed reduced government transport expenditure. If there is no disclosure of amounts saved by the reform, the public may have reason to suspect that the reform is actually a ploy 13 the income of officials in the form of a transport subsidy.

  The way government cars are used needs to be reformed, The government spending on purchase of cars was 80 billion yuan in 2008, and use and maintenance amounts to around 300 billion yuan a year.

  A study of ancient Chinese dynasties shows that the more reforms of the tax system, the heavier the taxes eventually 14 on subjects.

  The only way to prevent this vicious cycles from happening with government car reform today is for the higher authorities to have a strict and 15 audit of local finance.

  練習:

  1. A) on B) in C) about D) to

  2. A) indicates B) indicating C) indicated D) indicate

  3. A) completed B) terminated C) launched D) finished

  4. A) maintaining B) maintained C) maintenance D) maintain

  5. A) such a B) as such C) such that D) such

  6. A) by B) on C) through D) in

  7. A) which B) whether C) in which D) that

  8. A) providing B) offering C) supplying D) asking

  9. A) because B) therefore C) because of D) thus

  10. A) satisfied B) pleased C) skeptical D) confused

  11. A) less B) more C) faster D) farther

  12. A) how B) which C) that D) whether

  13. A) increased B) to be increased C) to increase D) increase

  14. A) levied B) taken C) consumed D) removed

  15. A) opaque B) transparent C) obscure D) ambiguous

  答案:A B C A A  A D D A C  B D C A B

  進行中的改革

  政府車輛使用的改革能夠真正減少辦公費用支出嗎?雖然部分地區政府已經朝著改革的方向有所行動,但是,并沒有報告顯示支出減少這樣的結果。

  杭州政府上個月實施了改革。副局級以下官員不能將公務出差作為商業旅行。相反,他們每個月可以根據自己的行政級別取得300元到2,600元不等的補貼。這項改革的目的是讓政府節省大量維護車輛的費用。

  位于中國浙江省東部的杭州并不是第一個實施這類改革的地區。鄰省江蘇省的省會南京市在五年前就已經實施了。然而,卻沒有任何報告表明南京市政府通過這些措施節省了費用。政府官員每月可能有出差補助。

  公眾有權利要求此類改革有透明度,因為這些費用花的正是納稅人的錢。納稅入要求政策制定有透明度是因為擔心決策者做出有悖于他們利益的事。

  很明顯,這些補助不是基于工作的需要。低級的公務員比高級公務員出差更多。因此,這項改革的作用似乎很小。

  只有透明度能告訴我們這些改革措施是否的確降低了政府的交通費用。如果沒有公開改革所節省的費用數目,那么,公眾有理由懷疑這項改革只是官員用車補的形式提高自己收入的一種手段。政府車輛的使用需要改革。2008年,政府花費了些購車費用,并且一年的使用和維護費用也是較大的。

  一項研究表明,稅收政策的改革越多,稅率也會發生相應的調整。現在,唯一能夠防些政府車輛改革發生惡性循環的方法就是更高級別政府機關能夠對地方財政進行嚴格而透明的監管。

  

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品久久久久久久一区探花 | 91精品久久久久久久久青青 | 午夜视频在线观看网站 | 亚洲一区二区免费 | 福利视频二区 | 国产精品久久久一区二区 | 色网站观看 | 成人国产在线 | 91大神新作在线观看 | 美日韩毛片 | 精品成人在线视频 | 成人免费观看视频大全 | 日韩视频一区二区三区四区 | 国产精品99久久久 | 欧美一a | 国产小视频网站 | 91视频高清| 国产精品久久久爽爽爽麻豆色哟哟 | 欧美日韩综合久久久 | 精品久久久久久久久久久久久久久 | 亚洲欧美日韩综合 | 91免费国产在线 | 午夜欧美一区二区三区在线播放 | 亚洲激情二区 | 国产一区二区三区免费在线观看 | 亚洲精品免费网站 | 欧美日产国产成人免费图片 | 国产免费成人av | 日韩小视频 | 在线观看成人av | 成人免费视频网站 | 精品视频首页 | 国产日韩欧美精品 | 久久国产精品影视 | 亚洲精品在线观看视频 | www久久国产| 麻豆视频一区二区 | 久久国产精品99精国产 | 国产二区三区 | 国产精品资源 | 久久伊人精品视频 |